Remick et. Al. v. City of Philadelphia

In April 2020, 10 people incarcerated in facilities in the Philadelphia Department of Prisons (PDP) filed a federal civil rights class-action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, against the city and the department over the conditions of the city’s jails.

The lawsuit (co-counseled by PILP; Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing, Feinberg & Lin LLP; ALC; and Dechert LLP) was brought on behalf of all people who were incarcerated at the time in the City of Philadelphia jails. It sought to protect them from jail conditions that would increase the likelihood that they would contract the novel coronavirus and become severely sick from COVID-19.

People who are incarcerated and detained are entitled to safe and humane conditions, including protection from COVID-19, based on the 8th Amendment’s right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, the 14th Amendment’s right to due process, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The scope of the lawsuit subsequently expanded to address a range of dire jail conditions, including insufficient out-of-cell time, delays in the provision of medical care, excessive force by corrections officers, violence among incarcerated people, and insufficient access to legal counsel and the courts.

June 2020

A federal judge approved a consent order on a partial settlement agreement. The consent order required the Philadelphia Department of Prisons to increase access to hygiene products and implement procedures that have been scientifically demonstrated to reduce the spread of COVID-19, and mandate that all staff who work in the prisons wear facemasks.

May 2021

After learning that PDP was not complying with the agreements laid out in the consent order with regard to out-of-cell time, a motion of Contempt was filed after discovering that the Philadelphia Department of Prisons were operating under inhumane conditions that did not meet the court-ordered guidelines.. A federal judge granted the motion and ordered Philadelphia jails to prove they were letting people out of their cells at least three hours a day, or pay a fine of $10,000 a day to the Philadelphia Bail Fund. The ruling stipulated that the fine would double every two weeks until the city complies.

June 2021

In an unprecedented settlement agreement, the City of Philadelphia agreed to make a one-time payment of $125,000 to the Philadelphia Bail Fund and the Philadelphia Community Bail Fund, to resolve violations of Court Orders requiring out-of-cell time for people incarcerated in Philadelphia Department of Prisons facilities.

November 2021

Following a court order, the City announced a plan to reinstate limited in-person visitation for vaccinated incarcerated individuals.

January 2022

PILP filed an amended complaint to add additional plaintiffs and filed a motion for a preliminary injunction.

April 2022

Class action settlement reached with the City of Philadelphia, designed to immediately address and improve conditions for people incarcerated in the Philadelphia Department of Prisons. U.S. District Court Judge Berle M. Schiller issued an order granting preliminary approval of the global settlement agreement.

November 4, 2022

After the settlement was approved by the Court, a Court Monitor was selected. The Court Monitor convened a Monitoring Team to evaluate the Defendants’ progress in implementing the changes required in the settlement agreement and began meeting with different stakeholders. The Court Monitor issued her first report on November 4, 2022, and the Remick legal team wrote a summary and key points from the Monitor’s report.

March 3, 2023

The Court Monitor issued her second report on March 3, 2023.  The report includes severe descriptions of the staffing crisis, out-of-cell time, segregation units, and use of force practices, among other things. The Remick legal team wrote a summary and key points from the Monitor’s second report.

October 12, 2023

The Court Monitor filed her third report.

March 29, 2024

The Court Monitor filed her fourth report.

April 8, 2024

ALC and co-counsels filed a motion for civil contempt and sanctions for the jails’ failures to comply with the Court-monitored Settlement Agreement. Calling for immediate resolution for longstanding issues, the motion also demands that daily fines be imposed, which ultimately would be distributed directly to individuals incarcerated in the Philadelphia Department of Prisons. Plaintiffs are requesting fines of $5 per person per day, which would total over $20,000 a day, until the city makes substantial progress on staffing and conditions in the jails. Read the press release about the filing for more details.

Case Timeline

04/20/20: Complaint Filed

04/20/20: Complaint Filed Cancel

06/03/20: Consent Order on Partial Settlement

06/03/20: Consent Order on Partial Settlement Cancel

05/14/21: Motion for Contempt and Sanctions

05/14/21: Motion for Contempt and Sanctions Cancel

05/20/21: Order for Grounds of Contempt

05/20/21: Order for Grounds of Contempt Cancel

06/23/21: Order and Settlement Agreement

06/23/21: Order and Settlement Agreement Cancel

09/14/21: Court Order

09/14/21: Court Order Cancel

10/14/21: First Amended Complaint Filed

10/14/21: First Amended Complaint Filed Cancel

11/10/21: Plaintiffs' Status Report

11/10/21: Plaintiffs' Status Report Cancel

01/07/22: Amended Complaint Updated

01/07/22: Amended Complaint Updated Cancel

01/07/22: Reply in Support of Contempt

01/07/22: Reply in Support of Contempt Cancel

01/07/22: Amended Motion for Class Certification

01/07/22: Amended Motion for Class Certification Cancel

01/07/22: Response in Opposition to Motion to Vacate

01/07/22: Response in Opposition to Motion to Vacate Cancel

01/07/22: Motion for Preliminary Injunction

01/07/22: Motion for Preliminary Injunction Cancel

04/12/22: Class Action Settlement

04/12/22: Class Action Settlement Cancel

04/12/22: Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval

04/12/22: Joint Motion for Preliminary Approval Cancel

04/13/22: Order for Preliminary Approval

04/13/22: Order for Preliminary Approval Cancel

11/04/22: Court Monitor’s First Report; Key Points

11/04/22: Court Monitor’s First Report; Key Points Cancel

03/23/23: Court Monitor’s Second Report; Key Points

03/23/23: Court Monitor’s Second Report; Key Points Cancel

10/12/23: Court Monitor's Third Report

10/12/23: Court Monitor's Third Report Cancel

03/29/24: Court Monitor's Fourth Report

03/29/24: Court Monitor's Fourth Report Cancel

04/08/24: Motion for Civil Contempt and Sanctions

04/08/24: Motion for Civil Contempt and Sanctions Cancel